All hotels in Mexico City, Distrito Federal, Mexico
1 room, 2 adults
You can collect Hotels.com™ Rewards nights here

Steinhaus Palacio de Versalles, Mexico City

3.5 stars
Palacio de Versalles No. 130, Lomas de Chapultepec, Mexico City, DF, 11930, Mexico, ‏‎0203 027 9779
Best Price GuaranteeBest Price Guarantee on hotel bookings. If you find a better price on exactly the same stay elsewhere we’ll match it

Comfortable Mexico City apartment with kitchenette

  • Free WiFi and free parking

Main amenities

  • 4 apartments
  • Daily housekeeping
  • Self-serve laundry

What’s around

  • Arcos Bosques (2.1 mi / 3.3 km)
  • Chapultepec Park (4.3 mi / 6.9 km)
No Hotels.com guest reviews yet
From 1 reviewsTripAdvisor Traveller Rating
See TripAdvisor reviews

Enter dates to check prices

Hotel Info: ‎020 3027 9803‎

from £56
  • Studio
  • Suite
  • One Bedroom

At a glance

Key facts

Hotel size

  • This hotel has 4 rooms

Arriving/leaving

  • Check-in time starts at 3:00 PM
  • Check-out time is noon
There is no front desk at this property. To make arrangements for check-in please contact the property at least 72 hours before arrival using the information on the booking confirmation.

Required at check in

  • Credit card or cash deposit required

  • Government-issued photo ID required

  • Minimum check-in age is 18

Travelling with others

Pets

  • Pets allowed

Internet

  • Free WiFi in public areas

  • Free WiFi in rooms

Transport

Parking

  • Free self parking

In the hotel

Services
  • Laundry facilities

In the room

Home comforts
  • Climate control
  • Coffee/tea maker
  • Iron/ironing board
Freshen up
  • Private bathroom
  • Shower only
  • Free toiletries
Be entertained
  • Flat-screen TV
  • Cable TV channels
Stay connected
  • Free WiFi
Food and drink
  • Full-sized refrigerator/freezer
  • Microwave
  • Kitchenette
  • Stovetop
  • Cookware, dishware, and utensils
  • Free bottled water
More
  • Daily housekeeping

Steinhaus Palacio de Versalles, Mexico City

Is the description of this hotel not correct? Tell us